Aviation’s Contribution to Overall Emissions
Aviation’s contribution to the overall CO2 emissions
is relatively small in comparison. Statistics from the Air Transport Action
Group show that “The global aviation industry produces around 2% of all
human-induced carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions” (“Facts & FIGURES”, 2016).
When compared to road transportation, “Aviation is responsible for 12% of CO2
emissions from all transports sources, compared to 74% from road transport” (“Facts
& FIGURES”, 2016). In terms of efficiency, “the new Airbus A380, Boeing
787, ATR-600 and Bombardier CSeries aircraft use less than 3 litres of jet fuel
per 100 passenger kilometres. This matches the efficiency of most modern
compact cars” (“Facts & FIGURES”, 2016).
Another thing to consider, is that “around 80% of
aviation CO2 emissions are emitted from flights of over 1,500 kilometers, for
which there is no practical alternative mode of transport” (“Facts &
FIGURES”, 2016)
United
Nations’ Agreement
The UN’s agreement sets carbon emission limits on
international flights. Joan Lowy states, “Airlines that exceed that limit in
future years, as most are expected to do, will have to offset their emissions
growth by buying credits from other industries and projects that limit
greenhouse gas emissions” (2016). These limitations will begin in two phases,
“the first phase of the airline agreement… is voluntary [and] covers 2021 to
2027” (Lowy, 2016). Lowy continues that “Some countries were still trying to
decide whether to participate in the voluntary phase” – Russia currently does
not plan on participating in this phase (2016). The agreement “becomes
mandatory from 2028 through 2035” (Lowy, 2016).
The agreement is supposed to limit carbon emissions,
and reward those that do so; however, the carriers are already expected to
exceed the amount allowed. As Lowy states, “Airlines that keep their emissions
down through more fuel efficient planes and aircraft operations will spend less
on carbon credits. But since aviation is growing rapidly, emissions growth is
expected to far outstrip increased efficiencies” (2016)
Paris
Agreement, and the new Elected Administration
President-elect Donald Trump has spoken against the
Paris Agreement, previously stating that “he would ‘renegotiate’ the global
agreement involving nearly all countries” and later stated “the US would pull
out” (“Donald Trump would cancel”, 2016).
Under the Paris Agreement, “countries decide for
themselves what their emissions cutting commitments will be” (“Donald Trump
would cancel”, 2016). This means that if “President Trump doesn't put emissions
cutting regulations into place, no one could force him to” (“Donald Trump would
cancel”, 2016). However, “If Trump withdraws from it, as he has promised, it
will take four year before the US actually leaves” (Hale, 2016).
Are
these Laws Necessary?
I can agree with the law to a degree, trying to be more
efficient and have less CO2 emissions is in no way a bad idea; however, 1. I’ve never
really been on the “global warming” bandwagon in the past, and 2. I feel that
they are focusing on the wrong industry. As mentioned, road transportation produces
74% of transport CO2 emissions. Seems like you would want to focus your efforts
there instead. “A third of the operating costs of airlines is spent on fuel (“Facts
& FIGURES”, 2016), so it’s already the goal of airlines to be more efficient
and burn less fuel.
References:
Donald Trump would 'cancel' Paris climate deal. (2016,
May 27). Retrieved from
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36401174
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36401174
Facts & FIGURES - Air Transport Action Group
(ATAG). (2016, May). Retrieved from
http://www.atag.org/facts-and-figures.html
http://www.atag.org/facts-and-figures.html
Hale, T. (2016, September 09). The Paris Agreement
will survive President Trump. Retrieved
from http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/11/09/the-paris-agreement-will-survive-
president-trump/
from http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/11/09/the-paris-agreement-will-survive-
president-trump/
Lowy, J. (2016, October 06). UN agreement reached on
aircraft climate-change emissions.
Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2016-10-06/un-
agreement-reached-on-aircraft-climate-change-emissions
Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2016-10-06/un-
agreement-reached-on-aircraft-climate-change-emissions
Good read. I found similar reports in the way of aviation’s overall emissions contribution, especially when compared to other industries. It doesn’t necessarily surprise me that aviation represents such a small number of CO2 emissions when compared to other modes of transportation such a motor vehicles. If one were to think about it, there are many more cars on the road than there are planes in the air.
ReplyDeleteI would agree with your opinion that the laws shouldn’t be solely focused on the aviation industry if we are looking to cut CO2 emissions. It’s tough to say why this particular spotlight for reducing emissions would focus on aviation and not the motor vehicle industry, but whatever the case, I think it’s worth looking into all modes of transportation for a means to reduce CO2 emissions.
Daniel,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your idea that they are focusing on the wrong industry. As mentioned, road transportation accounts for 74% of all transportation emissions. As I stated in my post, approximately 80% of the aviation emissions are from the longer flights that do not have a good alternative. Those flights are the 1500 km or longer ones which usually account for across an entire country or across the ocean. Yes, there are other ways to travel but flying saves a lot of time and with the new jets it is already much more efficient than before.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI also agree Dan that we should focus more on the larger polluting industries such as trucking. The public is misinformed and confused because of media bias on comparisons. If you do no research of course an airliner has a bigger footprint compared to a semi truck but unfortunately that's not an accurate depiction of the situation.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your post. The aviation world is not a fair playing field. The global emissions should be minimized more in the automotive world than the aviation world. 74% of global emissions by the auto industry has the ability to be minimized more than the 2 or 3% of the aviation emissions. Yes there is a necessity for laws but you can only minimize the 3% so much compared to other industries.
ReplyDeleteDan, I like the stance you took on putting more focus on other industries who have made less of an effort towards their contribution of emissions. I also like how you mentioned the time it would take if Trump were to withdraw from the Paris agreement. That timeline shows that the effects of that decision wouldn't even fall on this term of his presidency. I myself, do believe that global worming is a reality, so therefore taking steps to eliminate the effects seen is an excellent idea.
ReplyDeleteDaniel I agree to that they are focusing on the wrong part of the transportation industry. When you have ground transportation doing 74% more CO2. your post was a great read.
ReplyDelete