An Open Skies Agreement between two countries allows
the airlines of both countries to more freely serve the other country’s
airports without having to get individual permission for each and every
airport. The United States of America and The United Arab Emirates have such an
agreement; however, some of the U.S. carriers, particularly the Big Three
(American, Delta, and United), claim that UAE carriers like Emirates and Etihad
violate a section of the agreement which “ban[s] airlines from charging ‘prices
that are artificially low due to direct or indirect government subsidiary or
support’” (Sumers, 2016). The Big Three have argued that “Emirates, Etihad, and
Qatar combined have received more than $42 billion in government subsidies
since 2004” (Sumers, 2016) and, as such, requested a ban on these airline
adding new U.S. routes. Such a ban as not been enacted however.
Emirates and Etihad, on the other hand, have denied
receiving any unfair subsidies; instead focusing on a claim by the Big Three
which stated that “bookings from Orlando, San Francisco and Chicago to the
region and beyond were down by as much as 13.3 percent following the entry of
Emirates, Etihad Airways and Qatar Airways on those routes” (Kane, 2016) Emirates
responded to this claim by stating, “the latest rhetoric by the Big Three
American airlines once again demonstrates how they are only concerned with
their narrow interests, at the expense of consumers and the broader economic
interest” (Kane, 2016). Emirates claimed “they [the Big Three] don’t make a
corresponding effort to improve their service and product proposition to win
consumers’ hearts and wallets” (Kane, 2016), further adding that:
Instead of splurging on
lobbying campaigns to lock out competition, instead of blaming Gulf airlines
for loss of bookings or market share, the Big Three should rather consider how
they can redirect some of their record profit to improve the services they
provide to consumers (Kane, 2016)
Not all the U.S. airlines stand with the Big Three. In
2015, “FedEx Express…, Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Hawaiian Airlines, and
JetBlue Airways” wrote to the government stating “The Big 3 claim to support
Open Skies but their demands, if implemented, would endanger this network of
more than 100 U.S. aviation agreements” (Sumers, 2016).
Do
any Long-Haul U.S. Carriers Receive Government Subsidies?
Government subsidies are what this whole conversation
revolves around, and are what the Big Three are accusing the UAE carriers of
receiving. But, have the Big Three received subsidies themselves? Emirates has
claimed that “the Legacy Carriers have received more than $100 billion in
government support since 2002 and, with other U.S. carriers, receive annual benefits
potentially exceeding $24 billion” (“Emirates’ response”, 2015), adding that “The
Legacy Carriers come to this debate with unclean hands” (“Emirates’ response”,
2015). The U.S. carriers, of course, deny receiving any subsidies (Sumers,
2016).
This trend endures as both sides are unable to agree what
constitutes a subsidy (Sumers, 2016), with both sides constantly pointing at
their counterpart whilst rejecting any accusation against themselves, and thus,
the cycle of accuse/deny continues.
What
is the Export-Import Bank?
The Export-Import Bank describe themselves as “the
official export credit agency of the United States…. with
a mission of supporting American jobs by facilitating the export of U.S. goods
and services” (“About Us | EXIM”, n.d.). In simple terms, EXIM provides loans
to foreign companies (like Emirates), to buy U.S. produced goods (like Boeing
jets). The problem U.S. carriers have with this arrangement is that they do not
have access to the same loan options (instead having to pay a higher interest
rate), and airlines such as Delta have claimed that “rivals like Air India and
Emirates have used Ex-Im guarantees to lower their borrowing costs, then used
the savings to cut ticket prices on international routes that compete with
Delta or buy still more new jets” (Weisman & Lipton, 2015). This claim has
been contested however, and “Judge Rudolph Contreras of Federal District Court,
in a 72-page ruling…scoffed that $12 million in interest savings over 12 years
would have that kind of power” (Weisman & Lipton, 2015). When you consider
that Delta itself has “spent nearly $10 million on lobbying since 2012” against
EXIM, and Boeing’s “$69 million over that same period” in support of EXIM, it
makes the 12 million saved by foreign carriers seem not very significant
(Weisman & Lipton, 2015).
Is
the Global “Playing Field” for Long-Haul Carriers Fair?
I kind of feel this topic is not one which can be adequately
answered in one “overview” blog post, and instead would require more in-depth research
of the “facts” presented by both sides. But, I will say that from the
information I found, I would say no, the playing field is not “fair”; however,
that does not necessarily mean it needs to be. The world of business itself is
not “fair”, and government action does not really need to be enforced when one
company has an advantage over another. But, with that being said, if the companies
involved have come to an agreement (e.g. Open Skies), then yes, both companies
should definitely abide by the agreement set forth, and if not, government
involvement may be required.
The problem in this case, is it would seem neither side
can agree what the rules of the agreement mean. -.-
References:
About Us | EXIM.gov. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.exim.gov/about/Emirates’ response to claims raised about state-owned airlines in Qatar and the United Arab
Emirates. (2015, June 29). Retrieved from http://content.emirates.com/downloads
/ek/pdfs/openskies_rebuttal/EK_Response_Main.pdf
Kane, F. (2016, January 30). Open skies dispute between US and Gulf airlines escalates.
Retrieved from http://www.thenational.ae/business/aviation/open-skies-dispute-between-
us-and-gulf-airlines-escalates
Sumers, B. (2016, June 28). U.S. Airlines Set to Lose Major Battle Against Gulf Carriers in
Open Skies Debate. Retrieved from https://skift.com/2016/06/28/u-s-airlines-set-to-lose-
major-battle-against-gulf-carriers-in-open-skies-debate/
Weisman, J., & Lipton, E. (2015, April 6). Boeing and Delta Spend Millions in Fight Over
Export-Import Bank’s Existence. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/07/business/boeing-delta-air-lines-export-import-
bank.html
Good read! I found similar sources that all held the popular opinion of the unfairness presented to US-based airlines by several government owned foreign airlines. The opinion being that they thought it unfair to have competing foreign airlines to receive government subsidies. However, I was under the impression that almost all US airlines shared this opinion. I was surprised after reading your post to find out that certain US airlines such as JetBlue Airways and FedEx Express would rather leave the argument alone and not risk ruining the integrity of the Agreement.
ReplyDeleteYou make a great point that saying the business world is not fair. In aviation, who you know can be a large factor to your success. I also agree that since countries have agreed to the Open Skies Agreement, that they should be required to follow the same rules. Yes, they have different definitions of being subsidized, but that should not be an excuse. They are following the same rules throughout the agreement so they should all have the same definitions of the necessary terms.
ReplyDeleteDaniel and Ksmokov1 I agree with what you guys said, Business is not fair. but they should be following the same rules since they have agreed upon the Open Skies agreement. Also Daniel, with most of the people writing the same blog we do happen to read a lot of the same material, I actually missed that it went down 13.3% I did not read that part, I am going back and reading more on that. Once again, aa great read.
ReplyDeleteI agree that it is hard to give a solid opinion without more in depth research, or without interviewing anyone directly involved. The way it looks, is that it is an incredibly opinionated topic. I feel like the answer changes depending on who you ask.
ReplyDelete